lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] regulator: pwm: Add support for a fixed delay after duty cycle changes
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:21:15PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:

> A change of the duty cycle doesn't necessarily cause an immediate switch
> to the target voltage. On many PWM regulators there is a fixed "settle
> time" (irrespective of the jump size) that we need to wait after an
> upward jump. This change introduces the device tree property
> "settle-time-up-us" which allows us to specify a fixed delay after a
> voltage increase.

Why is this specific to regulators implemented with PWM controllers?
Most DCDCs have a PWM element and the concept of a hard time limit for
transition rather than a ramp rate doesn't seem like it'd be unique.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:58    [W:2.481 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site