lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH v2] xenbus: prefer list_for_each()
This is more efficient than list_for_each_safe() when list modification
is accompanied by breaking out of the loop.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
v2: Avoid commit message to continue from subject.
---
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- 4.8-rc1/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
+++ 4.8-rc1-xen-xenbus-dev-list_for_each/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev_frontend.c
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ out:

static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned msg_type, struct xenbus_file_priv *u)
{
- struct watch_adapter *watch, *tmp_watch;
+ struct watch_adapter *watch;
char *path, *token;
int err, rc;
LIST_HEAD(staging_q);
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int xenbus_write_watch(unsigned m
}
list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches);
} else {
- list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch, &u->watches, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(watch, &u->watches, list) {
if (!strcmp(watch->token, token) &&
!strcmp(watch->watch.node, path)) {
unregister_xenbus_watch(&watch->watch);


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-08-09 13:01    [W:0.076 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site