lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/4] perf/core: introduce PMU_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG
Hi Nilay,

>> static int perf_event_read(struct perf_event *event, bool group)
>> {
>> - int ret = 0;
>> + int ret = 0, cpu_to_read;
>>
>> - /*
>> - * If event is enabled and currently active on a CPU, update the
>> - * value in the event structure:
>> - */
>> - if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>> + cpu_to_read = find_cpu_to_read(event);
>> +
>> + if (cpu_to_read >= 0) {
>> struct perf_read_data data = {
>> .event = event,
>> .group = group,
>> .ret = 0,
>> };
>> - ret = smp_call_function_single(event->oncpu,
>> + ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu_to_read,
>> __perf_event_read, &data,
>> 1);
>> ret = ret ? : data.ret;
>> } else if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE) {
>>
>
> I would like to suggest a small change to this patch. I think the check on
> PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE should be retained in the perf_event_read()
> function. The new function should assume that the event is active. I find
> this more readable since the next check in function perf_event_read() is on
> PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE.

Two oncoming flags that Intel CQM/CMT will use are meant to allow read
even if event is inactive. This makes sense in CQM/CMT because the hw
RMID is always reserved. I am ok with keeping the check for
STATE_ACTIVE until those flags are actually introduced, tough.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-08-07 22:41    [W:0.071 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site