lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] Apple device properties
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:34:33PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug, at 06:13:58PM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > But I would like to understand the "cannot jump through pointers at
> > runtime" argument because the binary code looks to me like it should
> > work on 32 bit. I guess I must be missing something obvious?
>
> Ah no, I forgot that efi_boot_services_{32,64}_t doesn't contain
> pointers - it contains u32/u64 objects. So yeah, your patch looks
> fine.
>
> It does trigger the following warnings when building for i386 though,
>
> In file included from /dev/shm/mfleming/git/efi/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c:14:0:
> /dev/shm/mfleming/git/efi/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c: In function ???efi_get_memory_map???:
> /dev/shm/mfleming/git/efi/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h:205:3: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
> ((efi_boot_services_64_t *)__efi_early()->boot_services)->f : \
> ^

Right, sorry, I didn't compile-test that version on x86_32.

I'm sending out a new version now which compiles cleanly in all three
cases (x86_32, x86_64 with and without mixed-mode), works fine on my
64-bit EFI and the 32-bit code at least *looks* okay when disassembled.

By the way, arch/x86/Kconfig says that "it is not possible to boot a
mixed-mode enabled kernel via the EFI boot stub - a bootloader that
supports the EFI handover protocol must be used".

Is this still correct? With all the mixed-mode support in head_64.S
and eboot.c, I'm wondering what's missing?

Thanks,

Lukas

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:57    [W:0.071 / U:0.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site