Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: IB/core: Fine-tuning for ib_is_udata_cleared() | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Sun, 21 Aug 2016 22:15:32 +0200 |
| |
>>> Don't introduce a defect in patch 1 and correct >>> that introduced defect in patch 2. >> Which detail do you not like here? > > See above.
This feedback is not clearer.
I find that the two update steps should work in principle, shouldn't they?
I guess that we have got different preferences for the shown patch granularity. Another update variant can follow a bit later with the changes squashed together.
Regards, Markus
| |