lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 06/14] rpmsg: Indirect all virtio related function calls
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-remoteproc-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-remoteproc-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:17 AM
> To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>; Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 06/14] rpmsg: Indirect all virtio related function calls
>
> Create indirections for functions in prepration for splitting the rpmsg
> core functionality from the virtio backend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 131
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/linux/rpmsg.h | 23 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> index a9f8cc8d968b..1dc7a1149c51 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,17 @@ struct rpmsg_channel_info {
> /* Address 53 is reserved for advertising remote services */
> #define RPMSG_NS_ADDR (53)
>
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int
> len);
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_sendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int
> len,
> + u32 dst);
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_send_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32
> src,
> + u32 dst, void *data, int len);
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int
> len);
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_trysendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data,
> + int len, u32 dst);
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept,
> u32 src,
> + u32 dst, void *data, int len);
> +
> /* sysfs show configuration fields */
> #define rpmsg_show_attr(field, path, format_string) \
> static ssize_t \
> @@ -297,10 +308,17 @@ free_ept:
> struct rpmsg_endpoint *rpmsg_create_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb, void *priv, u32
> addr)
> {
> - return __rpmsg_create_ept(rpdev->vrp, rpdev, cb, priv, addr);
> + return rpdev->create_ept(rpdev, cb, priv, addr);
Hi Bjorn,

It will be good to test if pointer is valid before calling function.

> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_create_ept);
>
> +static struct rpmsg_endpoint *virtio_rpmsg_create_ept(struct
> rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> + rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb,
> + void *priv, u32 addr)
> +{
> + return __rpmsg_create_ept(rpdev->vrp, rpdev, cb, priv, addr);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * __rpmsg_destroy_ept() - destroy an existing rpmsg endpoint
> * @vrp: virtproc which owns this ept
> @@ -336,10 +354,15 @@ __rpmsg_destroy_ept(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
> */
> void rpmsg_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
> {
> - __rpmsg_destroy_ept(ept->rpdev->vrp, ept);
> + ept->rpdev->destroy_ept(ept);
Ditto

> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_destroy_ept);
>
> +static void virtio_rpmsg_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
> +{
> + __rpmsg_destroy_ept(ept->rpdev->vrp, ept);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * when an rpmsg driver is probed with a channel, we seamlessly create
> * it an endpoint, binding its rx callback to a unique local rpmsg
> @@ -352,7 +375,6 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv = to_rpmsg_driver(rpdev->dev.driver);
> - struct virtproc_info *vrp = rpdev->vrp;
> struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
> int err;
>
> @@ -373,6 +395,18 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + if (rpdev->announce_create)
> + err = rpdev->announce_create(rpdev);
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> +{
> + struct virtproc_info *vrp = rpdev->vrp;
> + struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> /* need to tell remote processor's name service about this channel ?
> */
> if (rpdev->announce &&
> virtio_has_feature(vrp->vdev, VIRTIO_RPMSG_F_NS)) {
> @@ -387,15 +421,13 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
> dev_err(dev, "failed to announce service %d\n", err);
> }
>
> -out:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
> {
> - struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> - struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv = to_rpmsg_driver(rpdev->dev.driver);
> struct virtproc_info *vrp = rpdev->vrp;
> + struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> int err = 0;
>
> /* tell remote processor's name service we're removing this channel
> */
> @@ -412,6 +444,18 @@ static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> dev_err(dev, "failed to announce service %d\n", err);
> }
>
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int rpmsg_dev_remove(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = to_rpmsg_device(dev);
> + struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv = to_rpmsg_driver(rpdev->dev.driver);
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (rpdev->announce_destroy)
> + err = rpdev->announce_destroy(rpdev);
> +
> rpdrv->remove(rpdev);
>
> rpmsg_destroy_ept(rpdev->ept);
> @@ -485,6 +529,19 @@ static int rpmsg_device_match(struct device *dev,
> void *data)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static const struct rpmsg_device virtio_rpmsg_ops = {
> + .create_ept = virtio_rpmsg_create_ept,
> + .destroy_ept = virtio_rpmsg_destroy_ept,
> + .send = virtio_rpmsg_send,
> + .sendto = virtio_rpmsg_sendto,
> + .send_offchannel = virtio_rpmsg_send_offchannel,
> + .trysend = virtio_rpmsg_trysend,
> + .trysendto = virtio_rpmsg_trysendto,
> + .trysend_offchannel = virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel,
> + .announce_create = virtio_rpmsg_announce_create,
> + .announce_destroy = virtio_rpmsg_announce_destroy,
> +};
Why not creating a dedicated ops struct like other framework?
Here ops are mixed with other parameters.

> +
> /*
> * create an rpmsg channel using its name and address info.
> * this function will be used to create both static and dynamic
> @@ -511,6 +568,9 @@ static struct rpmsg_device
> *rpmsg_create_channel(struct virtproc_info *vrp,
> if (!rpdev)
> return NULL;
>
> + /* Assign callbacks for rpmsg_channel */
> + *rpdev = virtio_rpmsg_ops;
It is not a simple affectation behind this operation, more a memcopy of the complete struct.
Not easy to read from my pov.
> +
> rpdev->vrp = vrp;
> rpdev->src = chinfo->src;
> rpdev->dst = chinfo->dst;
> @@ -793,11 +853,17 @@ out:
> int rpmsg_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> +
> + return rpdev->send(ept, data, len);
Test pointer before using it

> +}
> +
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int
> len)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> u32 src = ept->addr, dst = rpdev->dst;
>
> return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, true);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_send);
>
> /**
> * rpmsg_sendto() - send a message across to the remote processor, specify
> dst
> @@ -820,11 +886,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_send);
> int rpmsg_sendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len, u32 dst)
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> +
> + return rpdev->sendto(ept, data, len, dst);
Ditto

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_sendto);
> +
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_sendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int
> len,
> + u32 dst)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> u32 src = ept->addr;
>
> return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, true);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_sendto);
>
> /**
> * rpmsg_send_offchannel() - send a message using explicit src/dst
> addresses
> @@ -851,10 +925,18 @@ int rpmsg_send_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint
> *ept, u32 src, u32 dst,
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
>
> - return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, true);
> + return rpdev->send_offchannel(ept, src, dst, data, len);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_send_offchannel);
>
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_send_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32
> src,
> + u32 dst, void *data, int len)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> +
> + return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, true);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * rpmsg_send() - send a message across to the remote processor
> * @ept: the rpmsg endpoint
> @@ -875,11 +957,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_send_offchannel);
> int rpmsg_trysend(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> +
> + return rpdev->trysend(ept, data, len);
ditto
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysend);
> +
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int
> len)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> u32 src = ept->addr, dst = rpdev->dst;
>
> return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, false);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysend);
>
> /**
> * rpmsg_sendto() - send a message across to the remote processor, specify
> dst
> @@ -901,11 +990,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysend);
> int rpmsg_trysendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len, u32
> dst)
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> +
> + return rpdev->trysendto(ept, data, len, dst);
ditto
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysendto);
> +
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_trysendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data,
> + int len, u32 dst)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> u32 src = ept->addr;
>
> return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, false);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysendto);
>
> /**
> * rpmsg_send_offchannel() - send a message using explicit src/dst
> addresses
> @@ -931,10 +1028,18 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct
> rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst,
> {
> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
>
> - return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, false);
> + return rpdev->trysend_offchannel(ept, src, dst, data, len);
ditto
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysend_offchannel);
>
> +static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept,
> u32 src,
> + u32 dst, void *data, int len)
> +{
> + struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> +
> + return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, false);
> +}
> +
> static int rpmsg_recv_single(struct virtproc_info *vrp, struct device *dev,
> struct rpmsg_hdr *msg, unsigned int len)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg.h b/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> index 3e3d5b1c154a..0b290ae18e70 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ enum rpmsg_ns_flags {
> #define RPMSG_ADDR_ANY 0xFFFFFFFF
>
> struct virtproc_info;
> +struct rpmsg_device;
> +struct rpmsg_endpoint;
> +
> +typedef void (*rpmsg_rx_cb_t)(struct rpmsg_device *, void *, int, void *,
> u32);
>
> /**
> * rpmsg_device - device that belong to the rpmsg bus
> @@ -115,9 +119,24 @@ struct rpmsg_device {
> u32 dst;
> struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
> bool announce;
> -};
>
> -typedef void (*rpmsg_rx_cb_t)(struct rpmsg_device *, void *, int, void *,
> u32);
> + struct rpmsg_endpoint *(*create_ept)(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> + rpmsg_rx_cb_t cb, void *priv, u32
> addr);
> + void (*destroy_ept)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept);
> +
> + int (*send)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len);
> + int (*sendto)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len, u32
> dst);
> + int (*send_offchannel)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst,
> + void *data, int len);
> +
> + int (*trysend)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len);
> + int (*trysendto)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len, u32
> dst);
> + int (*trysend_offchannel)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32
> dst,
> + void *data, int len);
> +
> + int (*announce_create)(struct rpmsg_device *ept);
> + int (*announce_destroy)(struct rpmsg_device *ept);
> +};
It will be nice to document if ops are mandatory or optional.

Regards,
Loic
>
> /**
> * struct rpmsg_endpoint - binds a local rpmsg address to its user
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:57    [W:0.111 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site