lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ptrace group stop signal number not reset before PTRACE_INTERRUPT is delivered?
Damn, forgot to mention...

On 08/18, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Damn. I'll try to think more, but I simply can't decide what do we
> actually want in this case.

Yes, but at least

> Further, the current behavior seems to make it
> very hard (impossible?) to reliably tell a true group-stop from a
> PTRACE_INTERRUPT generated one.

is not true or I misunderstood... PTRACE_INTERRUPT doesn't lead to
group-stop, it stops the tracee individually.

And you if you get PTRACE_EVENT_STOP and WSTOPSIG() == SIGTTIN after
PTRACE_INTERRUPT, you know that the tracee did not report the "new"
SIGTTIN.

Or I missed your point?

Oleg.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:57    [W:0.048 / U:2.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site