lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hrtimer: spelling fixes
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Pratyush Patel
<pratyushpatel.1995@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Patel <pratyushpatel.1995@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> index e99df0f..c7f6f5b 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
> @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void clock_was_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
> static DECLARE_WORK(hrtimer_work, clock_was_set_work);
>
> /*
> - * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogramm the hrtimer
> + * Called from timekeeping and resume code to reprogram the hrtimer
> * interrupt device on all cpus.
> */
> void clock_was_set_delayed(void)
> @@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
>
> /*
> * Note: We clear the running state after enqueue_hrtimer and
> - * we do not reprogramm the event hardware. Happens either in
> + * we do not reprogram the event hardware. Happens either in
> * hrtimer_start_range_ns() or in hrtimer_interrupt()
> *
> * Note: Because we dropped the cpu_base->lock above,
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Queued. Thanks for sending this.

thanks
-john

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:57    [W:0.043 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site