lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] dma-buf: Wait on the reservation object when sync'ing before CPU access
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:42:18PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Rendering operations to the dma-buf are tracked implicitly via the
> reservation_object (dmabuf->resv). This is used to allow poll() to
> wait upon outstanding rendering (or just query the current status of
> rendering). The dma-buf sync ioctl allows userspace to prepare the
> dma-buf for CPU access, which should include waiting upon rendering.
> (Some drivers may need to do more work to ensure that the dma-buf mmap
> is coherent as well as complete.)
>
> v2: Always wait upon the reservation object implicitly. We choose to do
> it after the native handler in case it can do so more efficiently.
>
> Testcase: igt/prime_vgem
> Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit # *vgem*
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index ddaee60ae52a..cf04d249a6a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -586,6 +586,22 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment);
>
> +static int __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> + enum dma_data_direction direction)
> +{
> + bool write = (direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL ||
> + direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + struct reservation_object *resv = dmabuf->resv;
> + long ret;
> +
> + /* Wait on any implicit rendering fences */
> + ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(resv, write, true,
> + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> /**
> * dma_buf_begin_cpu_access - Must be called before accessing a dma_buf from the
> @@ -608,6 +624,13 @@ int dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> if (dmabuf->ops->begin_cpu_access)
> ret = dmabuf->ops->begin_cpu_access(dmabuf, direction);
>
> + /* Ensure that all fences are waited upon - but we first allow
> + * the native handler the chance to do so more efficiently if it
> + * chooses. A double invocation here will be reasonably cheap no-op.
> + */
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(dmabuf, direction);

Not sure we should wait first and the flush or the other way round. But I
don't think it'll matter for any current dma-buf exporter, so meh.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Sumits, can you pls pick this one up and put into drm-misc?
-Daniel

> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_begin_cpu_access);
> --
> 2.8.1
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-09-17 09:56    [W:0.202 / U:0.660 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site