Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/12] pinctrl: Add core pinctrl support for Aspeed SoCs | From | Benjamin Herrenschmidt <> | Date | Sat, 13 Aug 2016 10:58:14 +1000 |
| |
On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 15:18 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > I would probably prefer that option (introduce another field) > but you should make the overall decision, it's no strong opinion > from my side. > > > Would it be acceptable to document that requirement?
It might make it a bit less nasty (and easier to change later on if necessary) to use some kind of:
bool ast_signal_is_gpio(...)
And stick the strcmp in there.
Cheers, Ben.
| |