lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Portable Device Tree Connector -- conceptual
From
Date
On 07/08/16 12:20, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 07/08/16 00:26, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:15 , David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>>>
>
> < snip >
>
>>> Given that we're going to need new code to support this new connector
>>> model, I think we should also fix some of the uglies in the current
>>> overlay format while we're at it.
>>>
>>
>> We need to keep compatibility with the old format. There are 5 million
>> RPIs sold, half a million beaglebones and C.H.I.P. is coming out too.
>> They all use overlays in one form or another.
>>
>> That’s not counting all the custom boards that actively use them.
>>
>> We have a user base now.
>
> Please not that I AM NOT suggesting the we remove compatibility with
^^^ note

> the old format!!!
>
> But I need to push back on the idea that we have a user base that we
> need to keep compatibility with. If I understand correctly, that
> user base is based on using much code that is not in mainline, including
> an altered dtc and a cape manager.
>
> People using out of tree code can not use the fact that code exists and
> is being widely used to force us to mainline that out of tree code.
> That is the risk of using out of tree code.
>
> I do not want to start a big discussion about this now since there is
> no plan to remove the compatibility at this point.
>
> -Frank
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-08 22:01    [W:0.277 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site