Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:12:20 -0400 | From | Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <> | Subject | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] xen: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather() |
| |
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 09:06:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 08.07.16 at 16:17, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 06:21:52AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> For single items being collected this should be preferred as being more > >> typesafe (as the compiler can check format string and to-be-written-to > >> variable match) and more efficient (requiring one less parameter to be > >> passed). > >> > >> 1: xenbus: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather() > >> 2: xen-blkback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather() > >> 3: xen-blkfront: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather() > >> 4: xen-netback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather() > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> > >> --- > >> v2: Avoid commit messages to continue from subjects. Group into a series. > > > > To confuse this, Roger and I are the block sub-maintainers, which > > when we are happy, I send to Jens, while the rest go through Boris,David, > > and Juergen. > > Which is why originally I had sent all of these separately. Yet David > was pretty unhappy about that.
Aye! I am not critizing, just saying that this is getting complicated and you are in the unfortunate situation to have to deal with this - so want to apoligize for you having to go through this gauntlet.
| |