lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/19] x86/dumpstack: remove unnecessary stack pointer arguments
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> When calling show_stack_log_lvl() or dump_trace() with a regs argument,
> providing a stack pointer or frame pointer is redundant.
>

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> index 358fe1c..c533b8b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> u8 *ip;
>
> pr_emerg("Stack:\n");
> - show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, &regs->sp, 0, KERN_EMERG);
> + show_stack_log_lvl(NULL, regs, NULL, 0, KERN_EMERG);

This is weird -- note the &. You're at some risk of exposing a bug in
x86_32's kernel_stack_pointer() function, which is a mess. (I don't
see why it's written the way it is -- the actual return stack pointer
given a pt_regs is quite well defined -- if regs->cs & 3 != 0, then
it's regs->sp, else it's &regs->sp.)

That being said, this isn't a big deal, so:

Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>

If you want to make this all a bit more reliably on x86_32, you could
fix kernel_stack_pointer().

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-22 00:41    [W:0.706 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site