| From | Brian Gerst <> | Date | Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:57:31 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 18/32] signal: Consolidate {TS,TLF}_RESTORE_SIGMASK code |
| |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote: > In general, there's no need for the "restore sigmask" flag to live in > ti->flags. alpha, ia64, microblaze, powerpc, sh, sparc (64-bit only), > tile, and x86 use essentially identical alternative implementations, > placing the flag in ti->status. > > Replace those optimized implementations with an equally good common > implementation that stores it in a bitfield in struct task_struct > and drop the custom implementations. > > Additional architectures can opt in by removing their > TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK defines.
There is a small typo in the subject, should be "signal: Consolidate {TS,TIF}_RESTORE_SIGMASK code"
-- Brian Gerst
|