lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] bcache: Remove redundant parameter for cache_alloc()
From
Date


在 2016/7/1 12:24, Coly Li 写道:
> 在 16/7/1 上午10:09, wangyijing 写道:
>>
>>
>> 在 2016/6/29 18:20, Coly Li 写道:
>>> 在 16/6/22 上午10:10, Yijing Wang 写道:
>>>> Cache_sb is not used in cache_alloc, and we have copied
>>>> sb info to cache->sb already, remove it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>>>> index f5dbb4e..aecaace 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
>>>> @@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ void bch_cache_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>>>> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static int cache_alloc(struct cache_sb *sb, struct cache *ca)
>>>> +static int cache_alloc(struct cache *ca)
>>>> {
>>>> size_t free;
>>>> struct bucket *b;
>>>> @@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ static int register_cache(struct cache_sb *sb, struct page *sb_page,
>>>> if (blk_queue_discard(bdev_get_queue(ca->bdev)))
>>>> ca->discard = CACHE_DISCARD(&ca->sb);
>>>>
>>>> - ret = cache_alloc(sb, ca);
>>>> + ret = cache_alloc(ca);
>>>
>>> I am not sure whether struct cache_b *sb will be used in future, I
>>> suggest to let it be for now.
>>>
>>
>> We have copied sb to ca->sb, so if we need sb info in future, we could get info from ca->sb.
>>
>
> Hi Yijing,
>
> Your point makes sense, please add
> Reviewed-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> in your patch, if you don't mind :-)
>
> Thanks for your interpretation.
>
> Coly

Thanks for your review very much!

Thanks!
Yijing.



>
> .
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-07-01 09:01    [W:0.040 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site