Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Shaun Tancheff <> | Subject | [PATCH] Missing bio_put following submit_bio_wait | Date | Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:32:13 -0500 |
| |
submit_bio_wait() gives the caller an opportunity to examine struct bio and so expects the caller to issue the put_bio()
This fixes a memory leak reported by a few people in 4.7-rc2 kmemleak report after 9082e87bfbf8 ("block: remove struct bio_batch")
Signed-off-by: Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@seagate.com> Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: Larry Finger@lwfinger.net Tested-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com> --- block/blk-lib.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c index 23d7f30..9e29dc3 100644 --- a/block/blk-lib.c +++ b/block/blk-lib.c @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, ret = submit_bio_wait(type, bio); if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) ret = 0; + bio_put(bio); } blk_finish_plug(&plug); @@ -165,8 +166,10 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, } } - if (bio) + if (bio) { ret = submit_bio_wait(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio); + bio_put(bio); + } return ret != -EOPNOTSUPP ? ret : 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same); @@ -206,8 +209,11 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, } } - if (bio) - return submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio); + if (bio) { + ret = submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio); + bio_put(bio); + return ret; + } return 0; } -- 2.8.1
| |