Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Jun 2016 11:01:52 +0200 (CEST) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] HID: hiddev: use IS_ENABLED() for USB_HIDDEV |
| |
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, June 24, 2016 10:28:50 AM CEST Jiri Kosina wrote: > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> > > > > Use IS_ENABLED() for checking USB_HIDDEV to make sure compilation works > > for all possible config combinations. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> > > --- > > include/linux/hiddev.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/hiddev.h b/include/linux/hiddev.h > > index a5dd814..b6f48d6 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/hiddev.h > > +++ b/include/linux/hiddev.h > > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct hid_usage; > > struct hid_field; > > struct hid_report; > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV) > > int hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int force); > > void hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *); > > void hiddev_hid_event(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field, > > > > > > CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV is a 'bool' option, so the two look completely > equivalent. > > If we wanted to make USB_HIDDEV a loadable module by itself, > we'd also need to export those functions and change both the Kconfig > and Makefile files to ensure that you can't have USB_HIDDEV=m > in combination with USB_HID=y. > > What problem are you trying to fix specifically?
This mail was by my mistake generated from my private git tree; sorry for the noise, feel free to ignore it.
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
| |