Messages in this thread | | | From | Masahiro Yamada <> | Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:52:05 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/5] vmlinux.lds.h: replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED() |
| |
Hi Andrew,
2016-06-21 18:25 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:10 AM CEST Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2016-06-21 5:45 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>: >> > Dne 14.6.2016 v 07:58 Masahiro Yamada napsal(a): >> >> The use of config_enabled() against config options is ambiguous. >> >> >> >> Now, IS_ENABLED() is implemented purely with macro expansion, so >> >> let's replace config_enabled() with IS_ENABLED(). >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> >> > >> > I applied the whole series to kbuild.git#kbuild. >> > >> >> This series was applied by Andrew Morton last week. >> >> I do not want to double it. Could you drop it? > > Andrew usually drops patches from his tree when they show up in > another maintainer tree.
Now, each patch of this series appears twice in linux-next.
Andrew, Is it possible to drop this series from your tree?
Thanks
-- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
| |