lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21
From
Date
On 6/21/2016 2:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 07:29:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> >OK, I seem to have a tilepro-linux-gcc-6.1.1 build done. Lets see if I
>> >can build me a kernel with it.
> The below, much larger than desired, patch seems to make it go again.
>
> I had to s/__atomic_fetch/__atomic32_fetch/ to avoid a namespace clash
> with the builtin C11 atomic primitives.
>
> You want me to rename them all to regain consistent naming?

Yes, it's probably the right thing to do. All the internal routines with "atomic32"
or "atomic64" I assume you mean?

So what's your build process for the cross tools, by the way? I'm assuming
you're not doing a total bootstrap cross-tool build since you'd need minimal
kernel headers (linux/errno.h or whatever) in that case. I assume you're using
the host headers to build the cross tool?

So I'm a little confused how the other kernel headers are working out for you,
e.g. <arch/icache.h> is referenced when building the tilegx libgcc.

--
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-21 21:21    [W:0.113 / U:1.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site