lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [Y2038] [PATCH] crypto: use timespec64 for jent_get_nstime
Date
Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 18:51:32 schrieb Stephan Mueller:

Hi,

> > So.. again, I'd avoid using the "fast" accessor unless there is a
> > clear need or obvious benefit. Which should be documented.
>
> So, you suggest ktime_get_raw_ns? If yes, let me test that for one use case.

I tested ktime_get_raw_ns and it exhibits the same results as
ktime_get_raw_fast_ns and RDTSC. So, I see no objections in using
ktime_get_raw_ns.

Ciao
Stephan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-21 20:21    [W:0.049 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site