lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/5] /dev/random - a new approach
    From
    Date
    On 2016-06-18 12:31, Stephan Mueller wrote:
    > Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2016, 10:44:08 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
    >
    > Hi Theodore,
    >
    >>
    >> At the end of the day, with these devices you really badly need a
    >> hardware RNG. We can't generate randomness out of thin air. The only
    >> thing you really can do requires user space help, which is to generate
    >> keys lazily, or as late as possible, so you can gather as much entropy
    >> as you can --- and to feed in measurements from the WiFi (RSSI
    >> measurements, MAC addresses seen, etc.) This won't help much if you
    >> have an FBI van parked outside your house trying to carry out a
    >> TEMPEST attack, but hopefully it provides some protection against a
    >> remote attacker who isn't try to carry out an on-premises attack.
    >
    > All my measurements on such small systems like MIPS or smaller/older ARMs do
    > not seem to support that statement :-)
    Was this on real hardware, or in a virtual machine/emulator? Because if
    it's not on real hardware, you're harvesting entropy from the host
    system, not the emulated one. While I haven't done this with MIPS or
    ARM systems, I've taken similar measurements on SPARC64, x86_64, and
    PPC64 systems comparing real hardware and emulated hardware, and the
    emulated hardware _always_ has higher entropy, even when running the
    emulator on an identical CPU to the one being emulated and using KVM
    acceleration and passing through all the devices possible.

    Even if you were testing on real hardware, I'm still rather dubious, as
    every single test I've ever done on any hardware (SPARC, PPC, x86, ARM,
    and even PA-RISC) indicates that you can't harvest entropy as
    effectively from a smaller CPU compared to a large one, and this effect
    is significantly more pronounced on RISC systems.

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2016-06-20 20:21    [W:4.316 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site