lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/6] x86: Pass kernel thread parameters in fork_frame
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Instead of setting up a fake pt_regs context, put the kernel thread
>> function pointer and arg into the unused callee-restored registers
>> of struct fork_frame.
>
> This seems generally okay.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
>
>> @@ -146,19 +147,12 @@ int copy_thread_tls(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp,
>
>
>> if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
>> /* kernel thread */
>> memset(childregs, 0, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
>> - frame->ret_addr = (unsigned long) ret_from_kernel_thread;
>> - task_user_gs(p) = __KERNEL_STACK_CANARY;
>> - childregs->ds = __USER_DS;
>> - childregs->es = __USER_DS;
>> - childregs->fs = __KERNEL_PERCPU;
>
> Is the idea that do_execve promises to initialize all these fields to
> something sensible if the kernel thread in question tries to return to
> user mode?
>
> --Andy

Yes, do_execve() should be setting the full pt_regs.

--
Brian Gerst

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-20 00:21    [W:0.102 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site