lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched/deadline: remove useless param from setup_new_dl_entity
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:15:18 +0200
luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:28:37 +0100
> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > True, but we were practically already using the same parameter, under a
> > different name though, after
> >
> > 2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
> >
> > as we currently do:
> >
> > setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl)
> >
> > > This patch reverts part of the change done in
> > > commit 2d3d891d334 "sched/deadline: Add SCHED_DEADLINE inheritance
> > > logic"
> > >
> >
> > Before Luca's change we were doing
> >
> > setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se)
> >
> > in update_dl_entity() for a dl_se->new entity. So, I guess the question
> > is actually why we wanted to use pi_se's parameters (the potential PI
> > donor) for setting up a new entity?
> That's a good question :)
>
> > Maybe we broke the situation where a
> > task is currently boosted by a DEADLINE waiter and we swich the holder
> > to DEADLINE?
> I remember I tested this setup (using linaro's version of rt-app), and
> it seemed to work correctly...
>
> Re-reading the code now, I actually wonder why my patch did not break
> inheritance in this situation...
Ok; I think I know why inheritance is not broken (or, at least, it does
not appear to be broken when testing it with rt-app):
- When a -deadline task blocks on a mutex that is held by a SCHED_OTHER
or SCHED_FIFO task, such a task is promoted to -deadline
- setup_new_dl_entity() is invoked, and it sets the tasks' deadline to
rq_clock(rq) (+ 0), so the task holding the lock is immediately
scheduled
- as soon as update_curr_dl() is invoked (in the worst case at the next
tick), the task's deadline and runtime are set to the "desired values"
(using pi_se)

So, the behaviour is not changed too much respect to the previous one.



Luca

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-17 23:01    [W:0.058 / U:0.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site