Re: [PATCH] spi: add spi_sync_single_transfer wrapper for single spi_transfer
From
Lars-Peter Clausen <>
Date
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:10:48 +0200
On 06/16/2016 01:40 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: > The spi_sync_single_transfer function calls spi_sync_transfer > with a single spi_transfer element, instead of an array.
So, what's the advantage of using this as opposed to calling spi_sync_transfer with a 1 for the number of transfers?