lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/7] mm/compaction: split freepages without holding the zone lock
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:10:21PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 06/14/2016 01:52 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:31:15PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> > On 05/25/2016 10:37 PM, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> > > From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > We don't need to split freepages with holding the zone lock. It will cause
> >>> > > more contention on zone lock so not desirable.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> >> >
> >> > Hey Joonsoo,
> > Hello, Sasha.
> >> >
> >> > I'm seeing the following corruption/crash which seems to be related to
> >> > this patch:
> > Could you tell me why you think that following corruption is related
> > to this patch? list_del() in __isolate_free_page() is unchanged part.
> >
> > Before this patch, we did it by split_free_page() ->
> > __isolate_free_page() -> list_del(). With this patch, we do it by
> > calling __isolate_free_page() directly.
>
> I haven't bisected it, but it's the first time I see this issue and this
> commit seems to have done related changes that might cause this.
>
> I can go ahead with bisection if you don't think it's related.

Hmm... I can't find a bug in this patch for now. There are more candidates
on this area hat changed by me and it would be very helpful if you can
do bisection.

Thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-15 05:01    [W:0.200 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site