lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
From
Date
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 10:37 -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26:21AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 
> > > > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management
> > > > > > > Unit)
> > > > > > > —
> > > > > > > one of them?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > > > >


> > > > > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.

^^^ (1)

> > > >
> > > > Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
> > >
> > > Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
> >
> > I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?
>
> Nevermind :)
> I'd vote for pwmu, as it would make more sense WRT the hw
> documentation.

What about (1)?
Currently I renamed everything to pwr and it looks good.

--

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-14 20:21    [W:0.074 / U:0.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site