lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] Support DAX for device-mapper dm-linear devices
Date
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 09:50 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> writes:
> > > I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at,
> > > did you have raid0 in your plans?
> >
> > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate.
>
> dm-flakey would allow more xfstests test cases to run.  I'd say that's
> more important than linear or raid0.  ;-)

That's an interesting one.  We can emulate badblocks by failing
direct_access with -EIO, but I do not think we can emulate "drop_writes" and
"corrupt_bio_byte" features with DAX...

> Also, the next step in this work is to then decide how to determine on
> what numa node an LBA resides.  We had discussed this at a prior
> plumbers conference, and I think the consensus was to use xattrs.
> Toshi, do you also plan to do that work?

No, it's not my plan at this point.

Thanks,
-Toshi
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-14 18:41    [W:0.153 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site