lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/5] of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block
From
Date


On 2016/6/2 4:13, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> wrote:
>> For a normal memory@ devicetree node, its reg property can contains more
>> memory blocks.
>>
>> Because we don't known how many memory blocks maybe contained, so we try
>> from index=0, increase 1 until error returned(the end).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/of_numa.c | 26 +++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
>> index fb71b4e..fa85a51 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/of_numa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
>> @@ -63,13 +63,9 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
>> struct device_node *np = NULL;
>> struct resource rsrc;
>> u32 nid;
>> - int r = 0;
>> -
>> - for (;;) {
>> - np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "memory");
>> - if (!np)
>> - break;
>> + int i, r = 0;
>>
>> + for_each_node_by_type(np, "memory") {
>> r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid);
>> if (r == -EINVAL)
>> /*
>> @@ -78,21 +74,17 @@ static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
>> * "numa-node-id" property
>> */
>> continue;
>> - else if (r)
>> - /* some other error */
>> - break;
>>
>> - r = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &rsrc);
>> - if (r) {
>> - pr_err("NUMA: bad reg property in memory node\n");
>> - break;
>> - }
>> + for (i = 0; !r && !of_address_to_resource(np, i, &rsrc); i++)
>> + r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start, rsrc.end + 1);
>>
>> - r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start, rsrc.end + 1);
>> - if (r)
>> + if (!i || r) {
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> + pr_err("NUMA: bad property in memory node\n");
>> + r = r ? : -EINVAL;
>> break;
>> + }
>> }
>> - of_node_put(np);
>
> I believe you still need this and not the one above. You only need it
> within the loop if you return. Otherwise, the last node always need to
> be put.

OK. Thanks.

Addition with Matthias's suggestion, I will move "return" into this patch, so that this of_node_put(np) can be safely removed.


>
> With that, for the series:
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> Rob
>
> .
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-06-02 04:01    [W:0.084 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site