Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux/bitops.h | From | Sasha Levin <> | Date | Fri, 6 May 2016 16:08:27 -0400 |
| |
On 05/04/2016 08:48 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > That said, the fact that the other cases weren't changed > (rol64/ror64/ror32) does make that argument less interesting. Unless > there was some particular code that actively ended up using > "rol32(..0)" but not the other cases.
Right, the others seemed wrong as well but I couldn't find any code that triggers that, and preferred to fix just the one I was hitting.
I can go fix the rest if that's something we want to do?
Thanks, Sasha
| |