Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 6 May 2016 13:49:30 +0200 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? |
| |
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:25:19PM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:09:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > In turn, schedutil should probably depend on CONFIG_SMP. > > In the long term I wonder if it's worth putting PELT under its own > separate feature or just removing #ifdef CONFIG_SMP.
Probably should do that eventually yeah. It started out with being smp&&cgroup only, then we started using it for regular balancing and it became smp, and since we're now wanting to use it for pretty much everything we should just remove that.
| |