Messages in this thread | | | From | Steve Muckle <> | Date | Thu, 5 May 2016 17:25:19 -0700 | Subject | Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? |
| |
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:09:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > In turn, schedutil should probably depend on CONFIG_SMP.
In the long term I wonder if it's worth putting PELT under its own separate feature or just removing #ifdef CONFIG_SMP.
Aside from task migration CPU frequency updates there's also task creation and deletion which would apply on UP. The tunable infrastructure being created for scheduler-guided frequency may be of interest on UP also.
| |