lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH trivial] include/linux/memblock.h: Clean up code for several trivial details
On 5/30/16 22:33, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 22:21 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 5/29/16 23:08, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> These !! uses are't necessary.
>>> The compiler makes the bool return 0 or 1.
>> No, they are not necessary. But for me, it will be more clearer, since
>> in our kernel (at least in include/linux/), almost all Boolean functions
>> use Boolean value or expression for return (and "!!" are often used).
>
> Opinions vary.
>

OK, thanks. I shall send patch v2 for it within this week.

> There seem to be fewer than 20 !! uses in bool return
> functions in include/linux/
>

[root@localhost linux]# pwd
/upstream/linux-next/include/linux
[root@localhost linux]# grep -rn '!!' * | grep return | wc -l
32
[root@localhost linux]#

except 11 files which use int instead of bool as return value:

ide.h:854
mlx4/driver.h:76
mlx5/device.h:744
mmzone.h:793
mtd/mtd.h:412
nilfs2_fs.h:568
nilfs2_fs.h:602
nilfs2_fs.h:667
nilfs2_fs.h:771
page-flags.h:711
pagemap.h:54

> Finding the quantity of bool conversions in include/linux
> from something other than 0, 1, true, or false to 0 or 1
> is not trivial, but it is non-zero and seems rather more
> than 20.
>

[root@localhost linux]# grep -rn "\<return\>" * | grep ' & ' | grep -v "==" | grep -v '||' | grep -v 'struct' | grep -v '!=' | grep -v ',' | grep -v '?' | grep -v '!' | grep -v '&&' | wc -l
259

After give a glance, more than 60% are not for bool functions (so I
guess about 100 area hint).


Thanks
--
Chen Gang (陈刚)

Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-31 00:21    [W:0.051 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site