Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 May 2016 05:55:16 +1000 | Subject | Re: [git pull] drm for v4.7 | From | Dave Airlie <> |
| |
On 24 May 2016 at 05:23, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 05:20, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 24 May 2016 at 04:59, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> wrote: >>>> >>>> Here's the main drm pull request for 4.7, it's been >>>> a busy one, and I've been a bit more distracted in >>>> real life this merge window. >>> >>> Hmm. >>> >>> I pulled this, but I think I'll have to unpull again. >>> >>> Neither the diffstat not the shortlog match what you sent me. There's >>> four extra commits at the top that aren't mentioned: >>> >>> Dave Airlie (3): >>> drm/edid: move displayid tiled block parsing into separate function. >>> drm/edid: move displayid validation to it's own function. >>> drm/edid: add displayid detailed 1 timings to the modelist. (v1.1) >>> >>> Tomas Bzatek (1): >>> drm/displayid: Iterate over all DisplayID blocks >>> >>> was that intentional? What happened? Are those commits meant to be >>> merged, or are they wrong? They _look_ ok, but dammit, according to >>> your message they shouldn't be there. >> >> Okay they are meant to be in there, I just had them on my merge list, >> remembered I hadn't merged them, but had generated a pull request earlier >> to edit for you and forgot to regenerate it. I'll follow up with a new >> pull request >> if you like just to keep things straight. >> >> The "extern C" warnings were one of the patches Arnd sent, I'll follow up with >> those today.
FYI: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/87900/
is a link to Arnd's patch.
Dave.
| |