Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 May 2016 19:41:20 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/fpu/state: Fix XSAVES issues - Part 1 |
| |
* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:12:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Hm, the series does not apply cleanly: > > > > patching file arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h > > patching file arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h > > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c > > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c > > patching file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c > > Hunk #4 FAILED at 552. > > 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c > > > > which suggests that this series isn't against a recent x86 tree, right? > > That was based on the latest upstream kernel. I also keep a version based > on tip/master. Would it work?
Yes, tip/master would be fine, or upstream bc231d9ede99 that has the x86 tree already merged.
Thanks,
Ingo.
| |