lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.5 167/200] f2fs: dont need to call set_page_dirty for io error
Date
4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

commit e3ef18762f5757d3fb86f75ca59315db6d17d719 upstream.

If end_io gets an error, we don't need to set the page as dirty, since we
already set f2fs_stop_checkpoint which will not flush any data.

This will resolve the following warning.

======================================================
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
4.4.0+ #9 Tainted: G O
------------------------------------------------------
xfs_io/26773 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
(&(&sbi->inode_lock[i])->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffc025483f>] update_dirty_page+0x6f/0xd0 [f2fs]

and this task is already holding:
(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81396ea2>] blk_queue_bio+0x422/0x490
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&q->__queue_lock)->rlock){-.-.-.} -> (&(&sbi->inode_lock[i])->rlock){+.+...}

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio
f2fs_restore_and_release_control_page(&page);

if (unlikely(bio->bi_error)) {
- set_page_dirty(page);
set_bit(AS_EIO, &page->mapping->flags);
f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi);
}

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-05-03 03:21    [W:0.593 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site