Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] asix: Fix offset calculation in asix_rx_fixup() causing slow transmissions | From | Dean Jenkins <> | Date | Wed, 18 May 2016 00:01:03 +0100 |
| |
Hi John,
Thanks for your patch. I think the patch has already been applied.
The git commit subject of "asix: Fix offset calculation in asix_rx_fixup() causing slow transmissions"
I think is a bit misleading as the bug relates to reception and not transmission.
I guess that your intent was to say that "the through-put of communications was low" due to the bug.
Personally, I would of used a git subject like "asix: Fix asix_rx_fixup_interval() offset calculation for spanned frames"
But anyway, I have no real issue with the patch.
On 17/05/16 04:36, John Stultz wrote: > In testing with HiKey, we found that since > commit 3f30b158eba5 ("asix: On RX avoid creating bad Ethernet > frames"), > we're seeing lots of noise during network transfers: > > [ 239.027993] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Data Header synchronisation was lost, remaining 988 > [ 239.037310] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x54ebb5ec, offset 4 > [ 239.045519] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0xcdffe7a2, offset 4 > [ 239.275044] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Data Header synchronisation was lost, remaining 988 > [ 239.284355] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x1d36f59d, offset 4 > [ 239.292541] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0xaef3c1e9, offset 4 > [ 239.518996] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Data Header synchronisation was lost, remaining 988 > [ 239.528300] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x2881912, offset 4 > [ 239.536413] asix 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: asix_rx_fixup() Bad Header Length 0x5638f7e2, offset 4 > > And network throughput ends up being pretty bursty and slow with > a overall throughput of at best ~30kB/s (where as previously we > got 1.1MB/s with the slower USB1.1 "full speed" host). > > We found the issue also was reproducible on a x86_64 system, > using a "high-speed" USB2.0 port but the throughput did not > measurably drop (possibly due to the scp transfer being cpu > bound on my slow test hardware). > > After lots of debugging, I found the check added in the > problematic commit seems to be calculating the offset > incorrectly. > > In the normal case, in the main loop of the function, we do: > (where offset is zero, or set to "offset += (copy_length + 1) & > 0xfffe" in the previous loop) > rx->header = get_unaligned_le32(skb->data + > offset); > offset += sizeof(u32); > > But the problematic patch calculates: > offset = ((rx->remaining + 1) & 0xfffe) + sizeof(u32); > rx->header = get_unaligned_le32(skb->data + offset); > > Adding some debug logic to check those offset calculation used > to find rx->header, the one in problematic code is always too > large by sizeof(u32). > > Thus, this patch removes the incorrect " + sizeof(u32)" addition > in the problematic calculation, and resolves the issue. > > Cc: Dean Jenkins <Dean_Jenkins@mentor.com> > Cc: "David B. Robins" <linux@davidrobins.net> > Cc: Mark Craske <Mark_Craske@mentor.com> > Cc: Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org> > Cc: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org> > Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> > Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> #4.4+ > Reported-by: Yongqin Liu <yongqin.liu@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c > index 0c5c22b..7de5ab5 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int asix_rx_fixup_internal(struct usbnet *dev, struct sk_buff *skb, > * buffer. > */ > if (rx->remaining && (rx->remaining + sizeof(u32) <= skb->len)) { > - offset = ((rx->remaining + 1) & 0xfffe) + sizeof(u32); > + offset = ((rx->remaining + 1) & 0xfffe); I have verified that this fixes my ARM board. Thanks for finding the mistake. Note that the outer set of brackets could of been removed as they are redundant.
> rx->header = get_unaligned_le32(skb->data + offset); > offset = 0; > Thanks,
Best regards, Dean
-- Dean Jenkins Embedded Software Engineer Linux Transportation Solutions Mentor Embedded Software Division Mentor Graphics (UK) Ltd.
| |