Messages in this thread | | | From | Michal Nazarewicz <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_fs: report error if excess data received | Date | Wed, 11 May 2016 14:30:44 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, May 11 2016, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Also, returning -EOVERFLOW is not exactly correct here, because you'd > violate POSIX specification of read(), right ?
Maybe we could piggyback on:
EINVAL fd was created via a call to timerfd_create(2) and the wrong size buffer was given to read();
But I kinda agree. I’m not sure how much we need to care about this instead of having user space round their buffers up to the nearest max packet size boundary.
-- Best regards ミハウ “𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪86” ナザレヴイツ «If at first you don’t succeed, give up skydiving»
| |