Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 02/13] x86/xsaves: Rename xstate_size to kernel_xstate_size to explicitly distinguish xstate size in kernel from user space | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Tue, 10 May 2016 10:31:38 -0700 |
| |
On 05/10/2016 10:26 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> > It's nice to dump out interesting data in dmesg, but I'm curious why you >> > think it's interesting. > I think it would be interesting to know what the kernel's idea > is of user_xstate_size. I know, I know, one can follow the code > and figure out what it is but one can say the same about a lot of > other "interesting" data dumped in dmesg. And I'd like to know what > fpu__init_system_xstate_size_legacy() decided. And so I know how many > data is shuffled to/from userspace. > > And btw, this message needs more "humanization": > > [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[2]: 576, xstate_sizes[2]: 256 > > That doesn't tell me anything. > > Oh and it can be read out from CPUID too.
That all sounds like great stuff to do in a follow-on patchset after this XSAVES stuff.
| |