Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:32:03 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Allow use of "status = disabled" in regulator dts nodes |
| |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:54:48PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 27-04-16 17:52, Hans de Goede wrote: > >On 27-04-16 17:50, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:01:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>To repeat you really shouldn't have *any* DT nodes for regulators that > >>>aren't in use, there should be nothing to put in their nodes. If > >>>there's anything there that's a sign that your DT has problems.
> >>How should we deal with regulators that are on by default but are not > >>used in the system then?
> >I think we've already solved that one, we do list them, thereby giving the > >regulator core permission to touch them and then let the regulator core > >turn them off for us.
Yes.
> To clarify, I do not believe that this is not about not having nodes for > unused regulators, but about not having nodes for regulators which should not > be touched.
Correct. If we have constraints for a regulator then they should be accurate. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |