lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 59/66] bpf/verifier: reject invalid LD_ABS | BPF_DW instruction
Date
3.19.8-ckt20 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>

commit d82bccc69041a51f7b7b9b4a36db0772f4cdba21 upstream.

verifier must check for reserved size bits in instruction opcode and
reject BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_DW and BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_DW instructions,
otherwise interpreter will WARN_RATELIMIT on them during execution.

Fixes: ddd872bc3098 ("bpf: verifier: add checks for BPF_ABS | BPF_IND instructions")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7f68ff6..0d2cbc9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1213,6 +1213,7 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}

if (insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 ||
+ BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ||
(mode == BPF_ABS && insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0)) {
verbose("BPF_LD_ABS uses reserved fields\n");
return -EINVAL;
--
2.7.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-26 22:41    [W:0.169 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site