Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup | From | Cao jin <> | Date | Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:36:32 +0800 |
| |
On 04/21/2016 09:23 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0800 > Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >>> This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer >>> wanted to say here. >>> >> *it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions >> of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way* >> >> equals >> >> *it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think. >> >> So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in >> an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong? > > The original author, clearly, was talking about the degradation being > unacceptable. It seems clear enough, I don't think that change should be > made. >
Thanks, will remove the change in v2
-- Yours Sincerely,
Cao jin
| |