lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup
From
Date


On 04/21/2016 09:23 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0800
> Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>>> This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer
>>> wanted to say here.
>>>
>> *it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions
>> of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way*
>>
>> equals
>>
>> *it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think.
>>
>> So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in
>> an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong?
>
> The original author, clearly, was talking about the degradation being
> unacceptable. It seems clear enough, I don't think that change should be
> made.
>

Thanks, will remove the change in v2

--
Yours Sincerely,

Cao jin


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-21 16:01    [W:0.033 / U:1.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site