Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:23:23 -0600 | From | Jonathan Corbet <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] hrtimers: doc cleanup |
| |
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:25:41 +0800 Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > This change is incorrect - "unacceptable" is exactly what the writer > > wanted to say here. > > > *it cannot be 'designed out' without inevitably degrading other portions > of the timers.c code in an unacceptable way* > > equals > > *it can be 'designed out' ... in an acceptable way*, I think. > > So, just from semantics, my feeling is, *it cannot be 'designed out' in > an acceptable way* is the reason why integration is hard. Am I still wrong?
The original author, clearly, was talking about the degradation being unacceptable. It seems clear enough, I don't think that change should be made.
Thanks,
jon
| |