lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] arm64: Implement WFE based spin wait for MCS spinlocks
From
Date
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 12:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:13:38AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > Use WFE to avoid most spinning with MCS spinlocks. This is implemented
> > with the new cmpwait() mechanism for comparing and waiting for the MCS
> > locked value to change using LDXR + WFE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d295d9d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +#ifndef __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +#define __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +
> > +#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l) \
> > +do { \
> > + int locked_val; \
> > + for (;;) { \
> > + locked_val = READ_ONCE(*l); \
> > + if (locked_val) \
> > + break; \
> > + cmpwait(l, locked_val); \
> > + } \
> > + smp_rmb(); \
> > +} while (0)
>
> If you make the generic version use smp_cond_load_acquire() this isn't
> needed.

Yup, in the email thread about modifying the generic version to use
smp_cond_load_acquire(), I mentioned that overriding it in arch/arm64
would not be needed anymore.

Will made a suggestion about overriding it on arm64, but it turns out he
was just referring to avoiding the immediate dependency on
smp_cond_load_acquire().

Thanks,
Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-04-20 21:41    [W:0.063 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site