Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:34:29 -0700 | From | Darren Hart <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] asus-laptop: remove unused variable |
| |
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 11:48:52AM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:21:21PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:20:01PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote: > > > `out' was assigned value but it was never used so remove it > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giedrius Statkevičius <giedrius.statkevicius@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 3 --- > > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c > > > index d86d42e..39ddcee 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c > > > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c > > > @@ -946,11 +946,8 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_acpi_set(struct asus_laptop *asus, > > > const char *method) > > > { > > > int rv, value; > > > - int out = 0; > > > > > > rv = parse_arg(buf, count, &value); > > > - if (rv > 0) > > > - out = value ? 1 : 0; > > > > > > if (write_acpi_int(asus->handle, method, value)) > > > > out is indeed unused, however the rv > 0 condition is relevant as <=0 will pass > > value uninitialized to write_acpi_int. > That's indeed a problem. Somehow I missed that :( Should I make a v2 to include > another patch that checks for rv < 0 or send it as an independent one? >
Please just rewrite this one to do the right thing as a v2.
-- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center
| |