lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review
Date
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:11:08AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-queue boot: 205 boots: 14 failed, 190 passed with 1 offline (v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31)
>>
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31/
>>
>> Tree: stable-queue
>> Branch: local/linux-4.4.y.queue
>> Git Describe: v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31
>> Git Commit: cc3ba9c14b31161587ce85e9b5d642e730a2d0e8
>> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
>> Tested: 47 unique boards, 13 SoC families, 18 builds out of 132
>>
>> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31&fail
>>
>> arm:
>>
>> mxs_defconfig:
>> imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab
>>
>> omap2plus_defconfig:
>> omap4-panda: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y:
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> imx_v6_v7_defconfig:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> Offline Platforms:
>>
>> arm:
>>
>> mxs_defconfig:
>> imx28-duckbill: 1 offline lab
>
> I really don't know what these mean, any chance you can distill these
> down to "all is fine", or "there is a problem with this arch" type
> emails?

All is fine.

These failures are are on newly added boards coming from a new lab and
they're failing in other trees also, so we'll ignore them for now and
check with the specific lab owner.

Kevin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-09 07:02    [W:1.577 / U:1.744 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site