lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Fix command line filters in hierarchy mode
Hi Jiri,

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:13:56AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:06:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > When a command-line filter was applied in hierarchy mode, output was
> > broken especially when filtering on lower level. The higher level
> > entries didn't show up so it's hard to see the result.
> >
> > Also it needs to handle multi sort keys in a single level of hierarchy.
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > $ perf report --hierarchy -s 'cpu,{dso,comm}' --comms swapper --stdio
> > ...
> > # Overhead CPU / Shared Object+Command
> > # ........... ...........................
> > #
> > 13.79% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
> > 31.71% 000
> > 13.80% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
> > 0.43% [e1000e] swapper
> > 11.89% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
> > 9.18% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
> >
> > After:
> >
> > # Overhead CPU / Shared Object+Command
> > # ........... ...............................
> > #
> > 33.09% 003
> > 13.79% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
> > 31.71% 000
> > 13.80% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
> > 0.43% [e1000e] swapper
> > 21.90% 002
> > 11.89% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
> > 13.30% 001
> > 9.18% [kernel.vmlinux] swapper
>
> I'm getting funny numbers when using 'F' toggle in tui mode
>
> [jolsa@krava perf]$ ./perf report --hierarchy -s 'cpu,{dso,comm}' --comms swapper
>
> Samples: 254 of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 132263887
> Overhead CPU / Shared Object+Command ◆
> + 69.85% 001 ▒
> + 44.28% 000 ▒
> + 41.62% 002 ▒
> + 36.80% 003
>
>
> [jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf top --hierarchy -s 'cpu,{dso,comm}' --comms swapper
>
> Overhead CPU / Shared O+Command
> + 320.64% 000
> + 179.91% 002
> + 137.05% 003
> + 88.37% 001

Hmm.. I think it's because that the total period is a sum of periods
of leaf nodes. But if a filter is applied, sum of periods of upper
level entries can be different than sum of the lower level entries.
So it should use top-level entries periods instead IMHO.

I will send a fix.

Thanks,
Namhyung

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-09 14:21    [W:0.042 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site