lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v2 5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
From
Date
Hi Doug:

在 09/03/2016 07:34, Doug Anderson 写道:
> Xing Zheng,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_DRV, "emmc_drv", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON0, 1),
>> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE, "emmc_sample", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON1, 1),
>
> Can you and Jianqun Xu please coordinate? Though I don't have a TRM
> for rk3399 and I haven't looked through this whole patch, I know for
> sure there's a problem when I pick the latest patch series from both
> of you it doesn't compile.
>
> I believe this is the latest from each of you in patchwork:
>
> 8462411 [v3,1/3] dt-bindings: add bindings for rk3399 clock controller
> 8462431 [v3,2/3] clk: rockchip: add dt-binding header for rk3399
> 8462441 [v3,3/3] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for rk3399
>
> 8463741 [RESEND,v2,1/5] clk: rockchip: add more mux parameters for
> new pll sources
> 8463801 [RESEND,v2,2/5] clk: rockchip: Add support for multiple
> clock providers
> 8463771 [RESEND,v2,3/5] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399
> and similar socs
> 8463781 [RESEND,v2,4/5] clk: rockchip: add a COMPOSITE_FRACMUX_NOGATE type
> 8463831 [RESEND,v2,5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
>
>
> Specifically your patch from March 1st refers to SCLK_SDMMC_DRV and
> SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE. Those defines existed in Jianqun Xu's patch back
> on Feb 19th <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8355411/>, but his
> latest patch series from March 1st
> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8462431/> no longer has those
> #defines.
>
> Can you two resolve this so I can pick both patch series and see that
> they compile? ...or let me know where I messed up, of course.
>
ok, we will upload dtsi later after the clk-rk3399 driver been applied.
xing will send the patches for rk3399 together.

We hope the dtsi could be applied first but depends on clk driver, but
it seems
not a good idea, we will resend dtsi patch after more drivers are applied.

Thanks Doug.

> Thanks!
>
> -Doug
>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-09 02:41    [W:0.068 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site