lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 143/273] drm/radeon: hold reference to fences in radeon_sa_bo_new
Date
4.2.8-ckt5 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: =?UTF-8?q?Nicolai=20H=C3=A4hnle?= <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>

commit f6ff4f67cdf8455d0a4226eeeaf5af17c37d05eb upstream.

An arbitrary amount of time can pass between spin_unlock and
radeon_fence_wait_any, so we need to ensure that nobody frees the
fences from under us.

Based on the analogous fix for amdgpu.

Signed-off-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
index c507896..197b157 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
@@ -349,8 +349,13 @@ int radeon_sa_bo_new(struct radeon_device *rdev,
/* see if we can skip over some allocations */
} while (radeon_sa_bo_next_hole(sa_manager, fences, tries));

+ for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
+ radeon_fence_ref(fences[i]);
+
spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
r = radeon_fence_wait_any(rdev, fences, false);
+ for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
+ radeon_fence_unref(&fences[i]);
spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
/* if we have nothing to wait for block */
if (r == -ENOENT) {
--
2.7.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-08 01:21    [W:0.650 / U:2.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site