lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2016]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] perf core: Introduce new ioctl options to pause and resume ring buffer
From
Date


On 2016/3/29 20:54, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:41:29AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
>> Add new ioctl() to pause/resume ring-buffer output.
>>
>> In some situations we want to read from ring buffer only when we
>> ensure nothing can write to the ring buffer during reading. Without
>> this patch we have to turn off all events attached to this ring buffer
>> to achieve this.
>>
>> This patch is for supporting overwrite ring buffer. Following
>> commits will introduce new methods support reading from overwrite ring
>> buffer. Before reading, caller must ensure the ring buffer is frozen, or
>> the reading is unreliable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> I made the below changes.

Can I add your SOB when I resend it?

> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -4346,7 +4346,7 @@ static long _perf_ioctl(struct perf_even
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> rb = rcu_dereference(event->rb);
> - if (!event->rb) {
> + if (!event->rb || !event->nr_pages) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> --- a/kernel/events/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/events/internal.h
> @@ -66,9 +66,7 @@ static inline void rb_free_rcu(struct rc
> rb_free(rb);
> }
>
> -static inline void
> -rb_toggle_paused(struct ring_buffer *rb,
> - bool pause)
> +static inline void rb_toggle_paused(struct ring_buffer *rb, bool pause)
> {
> if (!pause && rb->nr_pages)
> rb->paused = 0;
> --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -248,7 +248,12 @@ ring_buffer_init(struct ring_buffer *rb,
> spin_lock_init(&rb->event_lock);
> init_irq_work(&rb->irq_work, rb_irq_work);
>
> - rb->paused = rb->nr_pages ? 0 : 1;
> + /*
> + * perf_output_begin() only checks rb->paused, therefore
> + * rb->paused must be true if we have no pages for output.
> + */
> + if (!rb->nr_pages)
> + rb->paused = 1;
> }

I still think we need to explicitly set rb->paused to 0
when rb->nr_pages is non-zero to avoid further improvement
re-init an old 'struct ring_buffer':

rb->paused = 0;
if (unlikely(!rb->nr_pages))
rb->paused = 1;

Thank you.

>
> static void ring_buffer_put_async(struct ring_buffer *rb)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2016-03-30 04:41    [W:0.232 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site