Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:12:10 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] Documentation: arm: define DT cpu capacity bindings |
| |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:49:56AM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote:
> But we'll still need to normalize this w.r.t the highest score we get on > a specific platform, right? And while we are at normalizing it, it is > probably simpler if we keep the frequency component as part of the > number, IMHO. But, maybe keeping the frequency component separate is > more acceptable from a DT binding perspective?
One possible issue with that: if we keep the frequency number as part of the core number then that might cause issues for devices with variants or system deployment decisions that remove some OPPs from a table. If the top OPP gets removed that would throw off the numbers. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |